It's fun to see the world so keyed up about ... a book. Not a TV show finale or an election or an overhyped movie release, but a book. And the whole Harry Potter franchise is, once again, an illustration of the fact that what looks so natural, so preordained, in retrospect was, in fact, utterly improbable and unforeseeable before the fact. Take a quick look at J.K. Rowling's Wikipedia entry. The manuscript of the first Harry Potter novel was rejected by twelve publishing houses. When a small publishing house did pick up the rights to the book (largely because the CEO's 8-year-old daughter demanded the next chapter after test-reading Chapter One) the editor advised Rowling to get a day job because she'd never make any money writing children's books. Ah, sweet irony.



I can certainly see why it was rejected. The first book is quite dull and not very well written. Actually, the first two books aren't all that good. It really isn't until the third book that Rowling starts to really get good. I'm glad the publisher gave her a chance though.
And yes, gotta love the irony.
Posted by: Ian Cook | Jul 20, 2007 at 07:32 AM
No way Ian. The first was among the best of her books I think. It is definitely the best suited for kids. (I thought 2 and 5 were the duds of the bunch if there were any...)
Posted by: Geoff J | Jul 20, 2007 at 11:13 AM
I am excited about the last book! My wife has already seen the OotP movie. I'm taking her on a date to see it tomorrow.
I too love the irony of the whole publishing bit. I cling to that thought thinking I too might publish a book some day.
Stick to yer guns!
Posted by: Apollo | Jul 20, 2007 at 12:10 PM
I'm in the dark on this one. I read the first two pages of the first book a few years ago, didn't like her style, and quit reading. Haven't seen any of the movies.
Posted by: Justin | Jul 20, 2007 at 06:31 PM