It's coming, according to Robert Novak. While a few hundred thousand dedicated Mormons will tune in to hear speeches by General Authorities this coming weekend, a hundred million might tune in to Mitt Romney's speech in a month or two or three in which he tries to explain to the American electorate that it's okay to vote for a Mormon for President. He doesn't have to explain that it's okay to vote for a woman or a Jew or an African-American — Americans are already okay with voting for those candidates if they are, in other respects, their preferred candidate. But being Mormon seems to be a real stretch for some voters and for almost all journalists. We'll all share in the result, so let's hope Mitt rises to the occasion when he faces the Mormon Moment. Can't think of any other person better fitted for the task.



Maybe we'll have a guest star at General Conference.
Posted by: Steve Evans | Oct 05, 2007 at 10:04 AM
No, somehow I don't think that would make his task any easier. A photo of Mitt sitting meekly listening to the Brethren would be worse than Dukakis and the tank.
Posted by: Dave | Oct 05, 2007 at 10:10 AM
Yes, for sure.
Posted by: Todd Wood | Oct 05, 2007 at 11:15 AM
Dave, for Governor Romney to play down his personal distinctions of Christianity . . . this will create the frustrations among evangelicals. Forthrightness is better than playing the part of a smiling ecumenical Protestant.
Posted by: Todd Wood | Oct 05, 2007 at 11:20 AM
That was my qualifier.
OK, I have commented three in a row; I am back on the bench. :)
Posted by: Todd Wood | Oct 05, 2007 at 11:22 AM
Todd pulls a comment hat trick ...
I'd reply that Romney is a candidate for office, not a proselyting missionary or an official LDS representative. Candidates downplay differences and promote common ground on many issues, including religion. I don't think Romney is any different in this than any other candidate, and it's fair to say he is rather more sincere in his religious statements than most candidates (who generally aren't particularly involved with their denominations, but coyly play it up for the media when campaigning).
Posted by: Dave | Oct 05, 2007 at 11:29 AM
In observation of the first tier Presidential Republican and Democratic candidates, I agree with you, Dave.
They market Jesus for their own political purposes . . . sounds like John 6.
Posted by: Todd Wood | Oct 05, 2007 at 11:57 AM
I hope a prepared statement by Romney on his Mormonism comes out better than when he's been asked questions by reporters (I'm specifically thinking of his seeming carelessness when saying "I can think of nothing more awful than polygamy" and "I haven't done baptisms for the dead in a long time").
Posted by: Christopher | Oct 05, 2007 at 01:44 PM
Hey Todd, you think Romney would be doing better - even with Christian conservatives - if he hadn't suddenly gone so emphatically pro life once it was time to woo evangelical voters?
Posted by: Seth R. | Oct 05, 2007 at 10:29 PM
Seth, I give him the benefit of the doubt on the issue you have mentioned.
I think what would frustrated conservative evangelicals is if he said he is just like other traditional Christians, downplaying distinctions on national public air.
He can say something like "Yes, here are some of the distinctives in my faith from traditional evangelical Christianity in America, we are different in many areas, but here is where we agree politically and morally and what the American people must maintain for a strong, free society."
Posted by: Todd Wood | Oct 06, 2007 at 12:10 PM