As I noted a few days ago, once one candidate's religion becomes a deal-killer for political office, anyone's religion can become a disqualifier. The latest evidence: this clumsy CNN story, apparently written by a reporter on Anderson Cooper's team. The misinformation in the article is discussed at length at Get Religion and at The Dallas Morning News. But it's the unstated message the piece is trying to convey that ought to ring a bell for any LDS reader: How could you vote for anyone who believes this stuff? For Romney, it was Mormonism; for Palin, it is Pentecostal beliefs, attributed to her because she attended a Pentecostal congregation in Wasilla until 2002.



Don't forget Obama's having to distance himself from his church and minister.
This all really is unfortunate. Thanks for reporting, Dave.
Posted by: Christopher | Sep 09, 2008 at 12:51 PM
nice write-up
Posted by: BrianJ | Sep 09, 2008 at 11:00 PM
I agree with you that it would be wrong to exclude Palin simply because she is a Pentecostal with outlandish beliefs.
In Palin's case, it seems that she injected her religion into politics. She wants creationism in the biology curriculum, sex education out of the curriculum, and identifies matters of war and peace as the will of God.
Wouldn't it be irresponsible of voters to ignore her explicit policy agenda?
Posted by: Hellmut | Sep 10, 2008 at 08:30 AM
"She wants creationism in the biology curriculum, sex education out of the curriculum"
Wrong and wrong.
I'm not sure where you've been, but these rumors were uncovered days ago.
Posted by: Tim J. | Sep 10, 2008 at 08:57 AM
Thanks to your correction, Tim, I have looked into these claims. I agree with you that the creationism accusation is unfair.
It appears to be the case, however, that Palin declared in an Eagle Forum questionnaire that she opposes "explicit" sex education.
If you have evidence to the contrary, I would be glad to see it.
Posted by: Hellmut | Sep 10, 2008 at 08:25 PM