I am reading my way through the hot new book American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us (Simon & Schuster, 2010). [Note: T&S is running a 12 Questions feature with David E. Campbell, one of the authors of the book.] In the first few chapters, the authors survey how religion in America has changed over the last fifty years, starting with the cultural earthquake of the Sixties, followed by two aftershocks: a conservative retrenchment that peaked in the eighties and then a renewed move away from organized religion that is presently in the ascendant. We're living in the second aftershock.
Here is how the authors summarize this change.
Since the 1950s one major shock and two major aftershocks have shaken and cleaved the American religious landscape, successively thrusting a large portion of one generation of Americans in a secular direction, then in reaction thrusting a different group of the population in a conservative religious direction, and finally in counterreaction to that first aftershock, sending yet another generation of Americans in a more secular direction. ... [T]his religious quake and its pair of aftershocks have left a deep rift in the political and religious topography of America. (p. 80.)
Let's focus on the second aftershock, in which, from the point of view of mainstream Mormonism, everything is moving in the wrong direction. Or, from the point of view of a teenager or young adult in sync with their generation, Mormonism seems completely out of touch with the way they see the world. The data discussed in Chapter Four show young adults unhappy with religious involvement in politics and increasingly unwilling to associate or self-identify with a religious tradition or denomination. An abrupt shift is noted around 1990, when suddenly college-age survey results find approval of marijuana, approval of homosexuality, and non-identification with a religious tradition or denomination all moving quickly upward. The changes are significant: eyeballing Figure 4.14 shows an increase in approval rates among American youth ages 18-29 between 1990 and 2009 for marijuana (23% to 42%), homosexuality (24% to 57%), and no religious preference (11% to 27%).
The authors do note that these "new nones are heavily drawn from the center and left of the political spectrum," an indication of the religious polarization discussed earlier in the book (p. 127). The authors also note a Pew Forum study focusing on these new nones and summarizing their distaste for religion in these words: "they became unaffiliated, at least in part, because they think of religious people as hypocritical, judgmental or insincere. Large numbers also say they became unaffiliated because they focus too much on rules and not enough on spirituality" (p. 131).
Obviously, this puts religious conservatives at odds with the direction of generational change. This is a problem for the LDS Church, and explains in part the difficulty in keeping LDS youth active after they leave home. There are other explanations that apply to the LDS Church specifically, but this factor applies to all conservative denominations and congregations. Here are two short quotations that are delivered as comments on the challenges facing conservative Christians but that certainly apply to the challenges facing the LDS Church.
In effect, the reach of evangelicalism is increasingly defined by the desire to convert conservative sexual morality into public policy. ... Continuing to sound the public trumpet of conservative personal morality may be the right thing to do from a theological point of view, but it may mean saving fewer souls now than it did a generation ago. (p. 131-32.)
So how many potential LDS conversions were lost because of public LDS support for Prop 8? How should Mormons or LDS leaders weigh this sort of tradeoff? And supporting conservative public policy also has a political effect.
Religious polarization has increasingly aligned Americans' religious affiliations with their political inclinations. (p. 132.)
Despite repeated proclamations of LDS political neutrality, LDS culture has nevertheless become politicized and very conservative. I don't believe that is consciously intended by senior LDS leaders; that's just the natural consequence (in the present cultural moment) of religious polarization and public support for conservative morality.
Quick disclaimer: This is not the last word on the how Mormonism is faring. In a subsequent post I'll review the authors' comments on Mormonism in particular.
Dave, do you think that Mormons have become more conservative than they were 30 years ago?
Posted by: J. Stapley | Jan 01, 2011 at 03:14 PM
I think we need to distinguish between religious conservatism and political conservatism. On both measures, I would say yes, Mormons are more conservative than two generations ago.
Posted by: Dave | Jan 01, 2011 at 05:50 PM
Have you written about why you believe that is the case, Dave? I'm having a hard time wrapping my mind around that.
Posted by: J. Stapley | Jan 01, 2011 at 07:34 PM
I'll cover the material from the book on politics and religion in post 3, but on page 365 the authors note that "the Mormon population in Utah has formed what is perhaps the strongest conservative voting bloc in the country ...."
As for religious conservatism, that certainly follows from a renewed emphasis (in the Correlation era) on inerrancy, infallibility, slavish dedication to traditional interpretations in LDS manuals, and a studious rejection of modern scholarship in manuals and LDS religion classes.
Posted by: Dave | Jan 02, 2011 at 09:02 PM
I believe we are now a full generation past the high tide of scriptural fundamentalism in LDS manuals and religion classes. That is not to say that the echoes do not reverberate, but the manuals for regular classes seem to be so minimalist in part because the Church does not want to take detailed positions on every point of scriptural theology, the way JFS2 and BRM were inclined to do, for example.
Posted by: Mark D. | Jan 02, 2011 at 10:02 PM
I agree with J. Stapley. I don't think that Mormons have really gotten more conservative socially or politically. It looks more like society (and especially academia and the media) has gotten much less conservative.
Posted by: Tom D | Jan 03, 2011 at 11:53 AM
Dave, agree that young people are moving away from traditional values, including organized religion. Mormons may become the new Amish.
The good news is this exception: there is a modern movement away from the Western diet of highly processed foods, towards a more natural, and healthful, diet.
In this they are approaching the prescriptions of the Word of Wisdom (diets rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, with a little meat).
A new noncommercial website/blog-- wordofwisdomliving.com--supports this movement. It is my work and I am asking for your support.
Skip Hellewell (email: [email protected])
Posted by: Skip Hellewell | Jan 07, 2011 at 11:24 AM