I notice that Dialogue added a weblog section to their links page and was kind enough to include a link to DMI — thanks! It's nice that By Common Consent caught their eye as well. For Bloggernacle trivia buffs, it's worth noting that DMI was doing the blogging thing for months and months before BCC arrived on the scene. Here is my post dated March 14, 2004 welcoming BCC to the Bloggernacle. For a short excursion into early Bloggernacle history, read this short summary by the talented folks over at T&S. And yes, I was around before T&S appeared, too — here's my post from November 20, 2003 welcoming Times & Seasons to the big show. How time flies.
On a related note, look for a big BCC announcement on Monday.
Posted by: Steve Evans | Aug 11, 2005 at 08:59 AM
Didn't Dialogue do an article on blogs recently? Or was that Sunstone? (Or am I just imagining the whole thing?)
Posted by: Clark Goble | Aug 11, 2005 at 10:17 AM
How cool Dave that you have been around and consistent in your blogging for that long. Nice work.
Posted by: danithew | Aug 11, 2005 at 10:24 AM
I think, however, that you will find that the first post of the then unnamed bloggernacle can be found here.
Posted by: Nate Oman | Aug 11, 2005 at 11:02 AM
Yes, I admit that the pseudonymous Metaphysical Elders were the first true LDS bloggers, even if they didn't have comments. Pioneer bloggers, if you will, and ME was sort of the prototype LDS group blog (at a time when software to run a true group blog wasn't quite available yet).
Posted by: Dave | Aug 11, 2005 at 06:18 PM
I'd like to see Clark's question answered if anyone knows.
Posted by: danithew | Aug 11, 2005 at 07:26 PM
The Metaphysical Elders had comments. There at the end when they made me a blogger I decided it would be funny to have arguments with my pseudonym. It didn't go quite as well as I'd hoped unfortunately and I feel a little bad about it now.
Posted by: Clark Goble | Aug 11, 2005 at 07:38 PM
I'll bet BCC's big announcement is a two-hour meeting schedule.
Posted by: Ann | Aug 11, 2005 at 09:08 PM
Ann, I second the motion.
Posted by: Dave | Aug 11, 2005 at 09:50 PM
Clark wrote: Didn't Dialogue do an article on blogs recently? Or was that Sunstone? (Or am I just imagining the whole thing?)
Neither publication has run an article on blogs, as far as I know. In recent issues Sunstone has reprinted blog posts by Greg Call and Kristine Haglund Harris in a column entitled "Blogwatch." They also reprinted a chunk of Ken Jennings' interview at Times and Seasons, but later expressed an apology to Jennings and Times and Seasons for doing so without express permission.
Posted by: Justin | Aug 12, 2005 at 08:09 AM
A similar discussion on the age of the bloggernacle took place on Our Thoughts back in Febraury.
Posted by: Kim Siever | Aug 12, 2005 at 11:09 AM
Thanks for the link, Kim. I wasn't really trying to stake a claim as the first LDS blog, just note that I've been around for a bit longer than some of our favorite group blogs.
Posted by: Dave | Aug 12, 2005 at 11:31 AM
I think Blogwatch was what I was thinking of along with that discussion regarding apologetics which I believe mentioned blogs.
Posted by: Clark Goble | Aug 12, 2005 at 12:47 PM
Yeah, well I'm still bitter that you called me a second-generation blog . . . naming M* first generation when I arrived SIX months before them. I can't remember where or when you did it, but by golly it stuck in my craw!
I'm just going to sit in this corner now, stroking my little bitter.
Oh and congratulations on the link from Dialogue. That's very cool.
Posted by: fMhLisa | Aug 12, 2005 at 01:44 PM
Lisa, at least the Beliefnet gig shows that FMH is a blog that has made its mark. I don't remember M* showing up on that short list.
Posted by: Dave | Aug 12, 2005 at 02:19 PM
Do you get many hits from them? I just checked and in July I got 177. No too bad, but nothing major.
Posted by: fMhLisa | Aug 12, 2005 at 04:26 PM
Lisa, I'll get four or five referral hits from them per day. But if you hit the post links at Beliefnet, it takes you to a framed page that has our page contents framed by ads, but with a Beliefnet IP address. I don't believe that page or address registers on our counters. Only if the reader somehow gets through to our actual site (by clicking "frame off" or by renavigating back into our home page) does it show as a hit on our counters. So there might actually be dozens of readers for every click on the counter.
Posted by: Dave | Aug 12, 2005 at 05:32 PM
There is talk from Levi Peterson [Editor at Dialogue] that he may consider including certain blog posts in letters to the editor in Dialogue. Better sharpen up the keypads ...
Posted by: lori | Aug 12, 2005 at 06:46 PM
I'm pleased to see the MA in the Dialogue link list too. That gives exposure to most of the active blogs in the 'Nacle.
Posted by: Geoff J | Aug 13, 2005 at 11:38 AM
Ahh, yes, the good old days of the M.E. (They're the reason why T & S has "onymous" in its tag). Their pseudonymity was sporadic — one day someone must have temorarily messed up the setting, because for a day or two it displayed names rather than pseudonyms. So you could see that the Lawyer was really ---- ----, the Historian was really ------ ------, and so forth.
Posted by: Kaimi | Aug 15, 2005 at 03:58 PM
BTW - school's starting up next week. When should the Bloggernacle Times arise from its slumber?
Posted by: Clark | Aug 16, 2005 at 08:35 PM