The BYU Religion Department issued a call for student papers last week as part of its annual Religious Education Student Symposium. BYU undergraduate and graduate students are invited to submit 10- to 12-page papers on "any religious topics ranging from scriptural topics and church history to world religions and teachings of living prophets." Winners get their paper published and may also receive cash prizes of up to $1,000. I would be interested in seeing a list of titles of papers submitted in prior years, but no links were given in the story.
The story quoted the apparent spokesperson for the program as saying past submissions have been "very bright and faithful." One of the goals of the program, she said, is "learning to write soundly with a cloak of faith." Cloak of faith — interesting metaphor. And what happens to the student who submits a paper that is not sufficiently cloaked with faith? Maybe the development of good cloaking skills is one of the goals of the program. The story notes that the program was started with the encouragement of a visiting General Authority, in order to develop gospel scholarship among the students. Before this program, notes a BYU prof, there had been no forum where "students could write meaningful papers in church history and doctrine where they could give their own ... perspective and viewpoints on matters of the church." The deadline for paper submissions is November 28.
I could be wrong, but I have a running hypothesis that, in terms of controversy, tone is more important than content. It's the difference between your mother sitting you down and saying, "Sweety, you're growing up and it's time to use deoderant" and having kids on the school bus chant, "You stink!"
Posted by: Jared | Nov 10, 2005 at 06:33 PM
Very good that BYU encourages students to write on topics related to church history and doctrine.
But yes, I too was turned off by the whole issue of the papers having to be "faithful". I mean, if BYU is supposed to be a real university instead of an advanced Sunday school they really have to start thinking more closely about their standards. In this way they lose all credibility as a university in my eyes. Faithful is good, but there is a time and place for everything.
Posted by: Northerner | Nov 10, 2005 at 10:41 PM
Northerner, I'm not sure if the "faithfulness" requirement is just added by the spokesperson or whether it reflects an actual requirement of a winning (or submitted) paper.
Apparently the 16 winning papers are published in an annual publication: here a link to the BYU Bookstore page for the 2003 publication, entitled Student Symposium 2003. Maybe someone can find it in the bookstore or the library and post the table of contents? I'm just curious whether the articles are Sunday-Schoolish or FARMSish.
Posted by: Dave | Nov 11, 2005 at 08:31 AM
I participated in the first such held a 3-4 (?) years ago. My uninformed impressions:
1. I'd like to think it is more FARMish than not. My piece delt with Ipsissima Verba (sp?), i.e. first person statements by deity in the Book of Mormon. Result = roughly 1 in 8 verses.
My article then morphed into a 1-page research in progress summarized in the monthly FARMS newsletter.
My entry for the 2nd year wasn't published, the same deal but this time on the Bible. Who can say?
My recollection of the first two years published pieces was that of entry level graduate student papers; some with real promise and no real fluff.
Posted by: lyle | Nov 14, 2005 at 12:23 PM