The land of moribund Catholicism has suddenly found religion it seems — Islamic religion. I know we've all been distracted by Bannergate, but it has been quite a couple of weeks in France. It's hard to really grasp what's going on from news media reports. A recent post at Get Religion helps explain why: Journalists can't cover riots very well. How do you interview a riot? How do you even get a handle on who is rioting, why they're participating, why it started this year rather than last year or next year? But don't be fooled by the confusion: This could be the biggest story of the year.
No doubt the French are thinking of May 1968, when a widespread student rebellion turned into something like a national strike for a few weeks, but everything petered out pretty quickly and then life went on much as before. I'm not sure they can put the genie back in the bottle so easily this time. These aren't puny little street performance protests, these are roaming, roaring LA-style street riots. It's going to take more than two gendarmes in a camionette to tame this beast.
The French haven't fared too well against colonial uprisings. They lost at Dien Bien Phu in 1954. They lost at Suez in 1956. They lost Algeria in the 1960s. Will they fare any better when the fight is in Parisian suburbs? The ethnic minorities of France have found their voice, bolstered by simmering social and religious discontent. They aren't saying much besides "We're very unhappy!", which makes dealing with things that much more difficult. If the French start shooting rioters, they inflame passions; more violence. If they back off, it will probably encourage the rioters to do more — they seem to be having a jolly good time burning Peugeots and Citroens, and they're not going to stop just because les polices start being nice to them tomorrow.
I haven't followed things closely, but I have yet to see any "good advice" on what the poor French can do in the short term. Lessons from Parisian history: "Let them eat cake" didn't work. A whiff of grapeshot showed better results.
The Mo app: Anyone know if LDS missionaries have been pulled out of afflicted neighborhood or regions? The areas where night-time riots are happening are typically the same general areas where LDS missionaries work and even live. I checked at LDS.org a couple of days ago and could find nothing. I hope they at least have informed parents of those serving LDS missions in France what is going on. I know that bureacrats (including Church bureaucrats) like to hoard information, but at least the families of those serving ought to be made aware of what their missionaries are being told to do (e.g., be in your apartment by 6:00 PM). It's just not a good week to be biking through the streets in certain Parisian neighborhoods past dark.
It's a difficult situation. I heard a commentator say on the news last night that French Muslims look upon the UK and the US with envy, that it is easier to be a Muslim in Britain and America than it is in France. That may be so, but I could point to many Britons who think that it is precisely our openness that made the July bombings possible.
Well, that said, I think the French attitude towards Islam (see headscarf ban) has been deplorable. It has come back to bite them.
The American application: don't let the French lecture you on how to deal with Islam.
Posted by: Ronan | Nov 08, 2005 at 05:33 AM
" The areas where night-time riots are happening are typically the same general areas where LDS missionaries work and even live."
Perhaps, but as a French missionary, I doubt it. If these are the predominantly ethnic neighborhoods, there aren't and shouldn't be missionaries living there.
France has problems, and one of them is that in spite of the fact that very few of them believe their own religion, they cling to it and look down their noses at any other religion, be it Mormon, Muslim, or Evangelical.
When visiting authorities would want to do some training, they'd say "Be an average investigator, what's that like?"
"Ok, I'm an agnostic/atheist Catholic who goes to Church on Christmas. I don't like my religion, but I was born Catholic and I'll die Catholic."
What can they do about it? Well, that law about not wearing religious items to school was a step in the wrong direction.
Posted by: Ben S. | Nov 08, 2005 at 07:22 AM
The Deseret News has a vague update from the church re LDS missionaries in the area.
Posted by: Justin | Nov 08, 2005 at 08:09 AM
If you had to drive a Citroen, you would start burning them too. :)
I think Ronan's analysis is correct. The French aren't particularly adept at cultural inclusion. This despite having the largest muslim minority in Europe.
I have to admit to being surprised at the riots. While there is pleanty of discontent in the zups, the prevailing sentiment I remember is apather; though, it has been 7 years since I have been back. It takes a fare amount of volition to burn your neighborhood.
Posted by: J. Stapley | Nov 08, 2005 at 08:32 AM
Dave, my sister is in the Paris mission, currently serving in Versailles, and we hadn't heard a thing until my mother called the missionary department yesterday. Missionaries (in the Paris mission, at least) have been confined to their apartments, and thus are unable to send their weekly emails from the internet cafes. (Rachel's missing letter was a source of much anxiety to us.) The missionary dep't must be dealing with hundreds of anxious parents; I wish the mission president had taken it upon himself to contact the worried parents before they had to call the missionary dep't themselves.
Posted by: Rosalynde | Nov 08, 2005 at 09:06 AM
Another great post, Dave. I too wish we had better information on the riots.
From what I can gather, most informed observers don't think that religion is an important motivation for the rioters. For example, this quote from a Paris correspondant:
I do think it's possible that an Islamic movement could become a more important factor if the underlying issues can't be resolved.
Posted by: ed | Nov 08, 2005 at 09:09 AM
I have to admit that I'm ashamed at the schadenfreude I've felt over this.
Ronan, I'll take I step further: don't let the French lecture you on anything.
Posted by: Davis Bell | Nov 08, 2005 at 09:35 AM
It's not just the French lecturing the US on Islam. It's the French lecturing the US on Katrina and Rodney King...
Posted by: Clark Goble | Nov 08, 2005 at 09:41 AM
Why do you assume that the Church and local mission hasn't responded promptly to this problem? Do you actually have any information, other than a quick glance at a web page that you assumed should be the location of said information, to indicate that they haven't been informing parents and keeping the missionaries safe? If not, I would suggest withholding judgement and not assuming the worst.
Posted by: Carl Youngblood | Nov 08, 2005 at 09:50 AM
Ronan, I disagree that the French attitude towards Islam has been deplorable. On the contrary, I think it shows one of the few ways that a national identity can be preserved in the face of radical religion. What we're seeing here is not an Islamic reaction per se, but a socio-economic backlash. These are poor immigrants, period.
Posted by: Steve Evans | Nov 08, 2005 at 10:15 AM
I think that the Egyptians may well view Suez in 1956 as an Anglo-French adventure in neo-colonialism, but they would bristle at the suggestion that Egypt was a colony of France before then, or that their experience with the French in 1956 was analogous to the Indochinese or the Algerian experience, other than that the French lost.
Posted by: Mark B. | Nov 08, 2005 at 10:47 AM
Very interesting post, very interesting discussion. A complex matter indeed.
First, the riots have little to do with Islam as a religion. As has been said, it's socio-economic, it's gangs, it's minors who enjoy vandalism. Background, however, is that many, most of these youngers come from the islamic milieu and that the socio-economic conditions of their (grand-)parents have created the environment they live in.
The relation between France and Islam cannot be understood without a view on the relation between the French Republic and churches. The French Republic is totally devoted to a very strict separation between state and religion, which entailed many historical conflicts since the French Revolution, and is still an important value today. Islam is circumventing that separation because it has no central authority and the local islamic entities function as cultural centers. Consequence: France ends up financing mosques and their cultural "animators", while it does not finance Catholic churches or priests, and refuses to give permission to Mormons to build a temple (among others, because no free entry to all). But for the principle of separation between State and religion, it banned headscarfs (or any other obvious religious symbol) from public schools. Actually, France has been pretty logical in its handling of all these issues, but the result is ...
Posted by: Wilfried | Nov 08, 2005 at 12:52 PM
Appeasement of Muslim extremists comes back to bite them in the arse. What's that German word for "enjoyment of the misfortune of others?"
Posted by: R.W. Rasband | Nov 08, 2005 at 06:48 PM
That German word is Schadenfreude.
Defined as: satisfaction or pleasure felt at someone else's misfortune.
[1890–95; < G, equiv. to Schaden harm + Freude joy]
Posted by: David B. | Nov 08, 2005 at 11:48 PM
I think it is still very unclear what role "religion" is playing in the events in France. Note that even if the participants themselves deny that their Islamicism has anything to do with their rioting, that doesn't decide the question. People often have no clear idea of what motivates their actions; when people do think they know why they're doing things, they are often just wrong about what is really motivating them. This is all doubly true for crowds, of course.
And that isn't even considering the bias of the media, which is largely unwilling to assign Islam any role in explaining the actions of Islamic fundamentalists or, here, of Islamic crowds. I'm not making the claim Islam is driving the present events in France, I'm just noting that to the extent Islam is part of the explanation, you won't have it explained to you by journalists or the media. They just aren't receiving signals on that frequency.
Posted by: Dave | Nov 09, 2005 at 01:00 PM
What sounds a note of worry appears to be the role religious leaders are trying to take. They want to act as intermediaries, which isn't bad on the face of it. But some (perhaps unwarrentedly) suggest that they are taking de facto control of the regions. That is, that rather than having any assimilation there will be little Islamic city states throughout France. There is also worry that the Muslim Brotherhood, which many know from Egypt, is exerting a lot of influence here.
So it seems the worry is that even if these are merely hooligans, that some are using it as an opportunity to gain more power.
Posted by: Clark Goble | Nov 09, 2005 at 09:20 PM