Get Religion gets it right with comments on the recent LA Times story. Quotes from the GR piece: "This DNA kerfuffle has been going on for years, long enough that I was wondering why the Times was covering it yesterday." That was my reaction, too. "I really do think this is a fascinating story, but the notion that this is jolting the bedrock of the Mormon faith might be overstating it." I suppose one needs strong headlines to sell papers.
Speaking of headlines, doesn't jolting bedrock seem like a mixed metaphor? The headline, you recall, was Bedrock of a Faith Jolted. You might fracture or chip away at bedrock or a foundation. Or you might jolt individuals, such as some members of the Church. But bedrock really doesn't get jolted. Or maybe this is just a clever way to make the point that the supposed "jolt" really hasn't made much of an impact on the Church. Somehow I don't think that was the hidden message the Times was trying to get across.
FARMS has a very good article on the subject that defuses the bomb. I have blogged it at my site.
Posted by: Stealtharachnid | Feb 22, 2006 at 09:47 PM
What the author suggested by jolting the bedrock was an earthquake. He is suggesting the entire foundation of the faith has been rocked, i.e., hyperbolic bullcrap.
Posted by: Kurt | Feb 23, 2006 at 05:52 AM
The bedrock should be jolted (like an earthquake many buildings are rocked but only few fall down), for those who take both the words of the LDS prophets and DNA experts seriously.
Posted by: Darren | Feb 23, 2006 at 09:20 AM
A report in the L A Times by William Lobdell (February 16, 2006) asserted that some Mormons were troubled by a “lack of discernible Hebrew blood in Native Americans”. In fact about one third of Native American males selected for DNA research belong to Y chromosome lineage groups commonly found in modern Jews. This includes the Q-P36 lineage group that is ancestral to the primary Native American lineage group Q3. Q-P36 is found in 5% of Ashkenazi Jews [1], 5% of Iraqi Jews [2] and a significant number of Iranian Jews [3]. Other west Eurasian lineages found in Native American test subjects include R, E3b, J, F, G, and I [4]. All of these are also found in modern Jews. The trouble isn’t a “lack of discernible Hebrew blood in Native Americans”, but a lack of discernible facts in Lobdell’s report.
[1] Behar et al, 2004, Contrasting patterns of Y chromosome variation in Ashkenazi Jewish and host non-Jewish European populations.
[2] Shen et al, 2004, Reconstruction of Patrilineages and Matrilineages of Samaritans and Other Israeli Populations From Y-Chromosome and Mitochondrial DNA Sequence Variation.
[3] Hammer et al, 1999, Jewish and Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations share a common pool of Y-chromosome biallelic haplotypes.
[4] Zegura et al, 2004, High-Resolution SNPs and Microsatellite Haplotypes Point to a Single, Recent Entry of Native American Y Chromosomes into the Americas
Posted by: Doug Forbes | Mar 06, 2006 at 07:42 PM