The SL Trib set up a bunch of journo-blogs last year and they're still running, including their "editorial blog," Plato's Cave. Until recently they allowed anonymous comments but ran them through a moderation queue for review before posting. But it got confusing because there were too many "anonymous" posts. So they just announced a new policy: all commenters must register at Blogger, but there will be no more moderation queue. It's not that I'm enjoying their difficulties, it's just reassuring to see that journo-bloggers — professional wordsmiths, after all — struggle with the same comment challenges that regular bloggers do. I wonder how the new policy has impacted their comment volume. Who knows, maybe chucking the hated comment queue actually increased their comment traffic.
Still, it's good to know with whom one is conversing--even on a blog. Too many anon's do get confusing. And my pet peeve is that it too often breeds too many snarky comments. The anon cloak seems to give too many folks the idea they can say what they want without any thought of responsibility.
Posted by: Guy Murray | Sep 12, 2006 at 11:08 PM
That is why anonymous comments are marked as left by Anonymous Cowards (ACs for short) over at Slashdot, and have a distributed real time moderation system to boot.
The latter was added when the signal to noise ratio on Slashdot plummeted when its popularity boomed. Now most casual readers only read the most highly rated comments - a popularity system which of course has its own weaknesses, unfortunately.
Posted by: Mark Butler | Sep 13, 2006 at 01:38 AM
too many folks the idea they can say what they want without any thought of responsibility.
can't they? I mean, this is the internet we're talking about here. It's the wild west, this place is governed only by a mix of zealous citizens and vigilantes.
Posted by: Ryan | Sep 13, 2006 at 09:29 AM
Yeah, Leon de Winter and Walter Laqueur ran into this same problem with their blog, The Free West, which is attached to the German newspaper Die Welt's website. At first, it was a free-for all. Then, they had to stem comments entirely and moderate everything, which as any blogger with experience knows is a royal pain. They are still moderating and it has greatly reduced their comments, which might be their actual aim.
Posted by: john f. | Sep 13, 2006 at 10:27 AM
#3 Ryan--so you're suggesting, that just because there is no internet police, then people have no responsibility for what they say? If so, then we have vastly different concepts of personal responsibility.
Posted by: Guy Murray | Sep 13, 2006 at 06:47 PM
Well I guess that's sort of what I am saying...
One thing about the internet that makes it great is the freedom from responsibility. It's a free-for-all here and that has made it an unrivaled marketplace of ideas. This has certainly had extremely negative results. But it has also been a great benefit for the spreading of all kinds of grassroots movements, philosophies, ventures, etc... That might be quashed in the "real world".
Posted by: Ryan | Sep 14, 2006 at 03:20 PM
Internet ≠ Real World
Posted by: Guy Murray | Sep 14, 2006 at 10:01 PM
Internet ≠ Real World
So why apply the rules of personal responsibility from the real world to the internet?
Posted by: Ryan | Sep 15, 2006 at 11:41 AM