A generation ago, Elder Packer delivered a classic General Conference address: Spiritual Crocodiles. In his address to BYU students earlier this week entitled Lehi's Dream and You, Elder Packer sounded many of the same themes, albeit without coining any new metaphors. Deseret News summarized Packer's remarks, including this quote:
"You live in an interesting generation where trials will be constant in your life," he said. "Learn to follow the promptings of the Holy Ghost. It is to be a shield, a protection and a teacher for you. Never be ashamed or embarrassed about the doctrines of the gospel or about the standards we teach in the church."
There's an echo in that quote of the (alleged) ancient Chinese proverb, "May you live in interesting times." Here's another quote, giving Packer's rather elementary advice for staying on the straight and narrow:
"You will be safe if you look like and groom like and act like an ordinary Latter-day Saint," President Packer said. "Dress modestly, attend your meetings, pay tithes, take the sacrament, honor the priesthood, honor your parents, follow your leaders, read the scriptures, study the Book of Mormon and pray, always pray. An unseen power will hold your hand as you hold to the iron rod."
BYU NewsNet also reported on Packer's address. Here's a sample from that writeup:
President Packer described the perpetrators of the attacks on our morality and beliefs as atheists and agnostics - the modern day Korihors and Nehors among us. They attack today's generation indirectly through tactics such as mocking and jest. Concerning such attacks, President Packer said the members of the church must be mindful of their own language and conduct.
"All of the mocking does not come from outside of this church," he said.
One can speculate about exactly what the "mocking and jest" is and where inside the Church it is coming from. Is that a reference to speakers inside the institutional Church — over the pulpit or inside BYU classrooms? [Advice to BYU profs: no more home teaching jokes in class.] Or does it refer to lighthearted Utah newspaper columnists or editorial cartoonists? Or to satirical websites that parody and ridicule LDS beliefs and practices?
Trivia question: the Deseret News article notes that Elder Packer flew bombers in the Pacific for the Air Force during World War II. I know some readers get a little squeamish about things military, but not I. Anyone know what planes he flew? B-17? B-24? B-25? B-29?
He was a B-24 pilot. The name of his plane was the Yard Bird.
See here for a talk that mentions some of his experiences.
Posted by: Jon in Austin | Jan 17, 2007 at 10:23 PM
I failed to read the link all the way through. That was his brother Leon not him... he was in the South Pacific and later stationed in Tokyo but the rest of the details escape me at the moment.
Posted by: Jon in Austin | Jan 17, 2007 at 10:25 PM
I think the mock and jest bit is quite true. And it happens both within and without the church. Reminds me of Nephi's vision. It's an effective rhetorical tool. You don't need to refute someone's principles or ethics. Just make fun of them. It's a common and sad tendency of the so-called "postmodern" generation where everything is irony.
Posted by: Clark Goble | Jan 17, 2007 at 11:06 PM
Thanks for the link, Jon. It sounds like Elder Packer was a B-17 co-pilot and flew in and out of Japan during the postwar occupation by Allied forces. His brother flew the B-24 Liberator, a very difficult plane to fly. Stephen Ambrose wrote a book about the B-24 and its pilots, The Wild Blue, among whose number was none other than George McGovern.
Posted by: Dave | Jan 17, 2007 at 11:28 PM
Everyone knows there is nothing to mock in religion.
Posted by: Duff | Jan 18, 2007 at 04:27 AM
But Dave, don't you have a book in your bookstore that chronicles the decline of atheism?
And since you know atheists are already rare -- and if on top of that they're on the decline -- how could they possibly pose a serious threat to the church?
Posted by: C. L. Hanson | Jan 18, 2007 at 06:00 AM
CL, there is some ambiguity in Elder Packer's identification: on the one hand he refers to "atheists and agnostics"; on the other hand he implies that some of the noise (probably the more worrisome portion of it) comes from inside the Church, which is an entirely different group of people largely devoid of self-identifying atheists and agnostics.
One must remember that Elder Packer is on the conservative end of the already conservative Mormon theological spectrum. Some in that category classify entire disciplines and anyone associated with them (history, biology, philosophy) as somehow atheistic. That's obviously not how LDS leadership as a whole views things. So it may be that Elder Packer's use of the terms "atheists and agnostics" is just a swipe at intellectual disciplines he disagrees with.
Posted by: Dave | Jan 18, 2007 at 08:35 AM
Dave, as a curiosity, why are you so antagonistic to Elder Packer?
Posted by: Matt W. | Jan 18, 2007 at 08:43 AM
Antagonistic? Matt, it's hard to see how I could be more complimentary. I called Spiritual Croc 1.0 a "classic," gave straight quotes from articles on his recent talk, and higlighted and praised his service as a pilot in WWII. Noting that his doctrinal views are at the conservative end of the spectrum is not a criticism, just an observation. There is a spectrum, you know.
Uh, maybe you're just upset that I mentioned George McGovern.
Posted by: Dave | Jan 18, 2007 at 10:30 AM
"intellectual disciplines he disagrees with"
"that might be the nicest thing I've ever read about him"
These seem antagonistic to me.
I am widely aware of the spectrum of what is considered doctrine. Is it because you disagree with his end of the spectrum or see him disagreeing with your end of the spectrum that you are antagonistic toward him?
I don't even know who George McGovern is. Is that a Utah thing?
Posted by: Matt W. | Jan 18, 2007 at 11:06 AM
Matt, that seems like a strained reading of what are complimentary or, at worst, objective remarks; they're hardly antagonistic.
If you want to see me a little antagonistic, try here or here. That's not my natural style. I have to try really hard to be antagonistic.
Posted by: Dave | Jan 18, 2007 at 11:30 AM
Fair enough, I can accept it if I am misreading you.
Posted by: Matt W. | Jan 18, 2007 at 11:43 AM
I don't even know who George McGovern is...
Matt, you're showing your age!
Posted by: Bored in Vernal | Jan 18, 2007 at 11:44 AM
Yeah, I was born in 77. Having just wiki'd the Guy, I am surprised he isn't just some sort of funny pseudonym. A man named McGovern in Politics sounds like a McDonald's Parody to me....
Posted by: Matt W. | Jan 18, 2007 at 12:33 PM
Ah, good.
If you don't feel threatened by self-identifying atheists, then link to me in your solo blogs!!! :D
Everybody knows that atheists are cute and cuddly!!! ;-)
Posted by: C.L. Hanson | Jan 18, 2007 at 01:17 PM
Atheists aside, Packer also trained on a B-24 testing out early versions of airborne radar in 1943.
Posted by: Jon in Austin | Jan 18, 2007 at 10:11 PM
The MP3 version of President Packer's talk is now available for free download.
Posted by: R. Gary | Jan 19, 2007 at 05:05 PM
I'm pretty sure my father would not appreciate much of the good-natured self-mocking of belief and religious practice that even some of the most conservative (not in a political sense) participants in the bloggernacle use on a frequent basis.
He would frequently take me to task for "making light of sacred things." And I'm sure he would feel the same about much of the dialogue within the bloggernacle.
To be honest, I'm still unsure whether he's right or wrong. Perhaps we are too flippant about our religion.
Posted by: Seth R. | Jan 27, 2007 at 10:27 AM